Status Update
Investment Overview
| Company name | Kelda Showers Limited |
| Investment vehicle | UK Limited Company |
| Principal business activity | Innovative shower technology |
| Growthdeck/Radius investors' funding | £1,581,000 |
| Investment completion dates | December 2015 - November 2016 |
| Growthdeck investors' equity % | 37.3% fully diluted |
| Growthdeck investors' protections | Investor Representative consent required for key company actions |
| Growthdeck involvement | David Harding (Chairman) and Simon Emary (Investor Representative) |
Trading Performance
| Summary P&L (£’000s) |
Yr to 31 Dec 2017 | Revised Budget (24H Plan) |
| Sales | 142,873 | 3,350,000 |
| Cost of Sales | (65,544) | (1,652,584) |
| Gross Margin | 77,329 | 1,697,416 |
| GM % | 54% | 51% |
| Overheads | (1,394,708) | 2,062,584 |
| EBIT | (1,317,379) | 3,760,000 |
Source: unaudited management accounts for the year ended 31 December 2017
Management Update
Noel Murray, the Company’s CTO, has resigned as a director and employee. He remains as a consultant to the Board and a supportive shareholder. The Company has recruited an experienced Head of Design to cover that element of Mr Murray’s role. Additional Production Engineering resource will be working closely with the new sub-contract manufacturer to be appointed following the quality issues set out above.
Cash Update
At the end of December the Company had a cash balance of £711k. The delay to revenues means that the Company will require further funding in Q2. Discussions are underway with several HNW individuals and funds with an interest in green investments, at similar valuations to the 24Haymarket investment. There are also two grant applications in process, with decisions due early Q2.
Funding discussions are for £1-£1.2m (depending on the level of likely grant income) at the same price paid by the 24Haymarket investors in June 2017. However, the Board is also considering a rights issue to cover the period through to the new product launches.
Exit Planning
It is still considered likely that both private equity and trade buyers could be potential acquirers once the potential is demonstrated. However, it is currently too early for any specific discussions.
Summary
Whilst the significant underperformance against plan, and the need for a further round of investment, are both disappointing, we believe the potential for this technology remains as strong. Unlike many “water saving” ideas, this one has now been proved both scientifically by Southampton University, and in a large scale commercial roll out with Pure Gyms. The Company now needs to execute against that potential.